Creation in 6 Days? Summary

Creation in 6 Days? Introduction

HOW TO UNMASK THE FAKE Scientifical Long Dates

"Elastic" Days?

Three Parallel Theories for the Origin of the Universe. Only One is True.

Watch out: there are Attempts to Make 'Big Bounce' and 'Big Bang' Compatible

The Only Evidence: Universe is Expanding. Rest is Speculation.

Continents Separated "Millions of Years" ago?

Astrophysics: Stars Dating Billions of Years?

Teleportation Exists. Consequences.

Possible Speed Incoherencies in Big Bang Model

Global Vision of Universe, containing Earth, Paradise, Hell...

Comparing Big Bang and Creation Theory

Fake Long Dates: Conclusion

Why only little Quantities Antimatter?

Over www.christianideas.eu...

What about the Creation of the World/Universe? Introduction

Back to top

Note: Jesus in a private message in the French old web site www.apparitionsmariales.org: Théorie de l'Evolution advises that the theories of Evolution and Big Bang contain errors and are based over non proofed assumptions.

Note2: My assumptions in this chapter may be improved/updated with time. When possible please check it with facts. We should, in priciple, assume the current Universe situation (Astronomic scientific data) as true, but we shall watch out when referring/accepting past non proofed situations concerning the Universe, e. g., big dates etc.

Don't Believe in the Scientific Dates

Back to top

What to say about the book of Genesis concerning the creation of the world? I'm convinced that's true, given the declarations of Jesus and Mary concerning mankind: They said, during their private apparitions, that the first man was Adam, created by God, around 6100 years ago.

How to Unmask the Fake Scientific Dates?

SIMPLY CROSS CHECK DETAILED HISTORY OF MANKIND FROM 4000 YEARS AGO...

THE TRUTH CONFIRMS GOOD BIBLES, book of Genesis, first chapters, even if it’s hard to believe literally.

THUS, ~4000 YEARS AGO, WE HAD THE EMPIRE OF AKKAD, M EAST, IRAQ, AND THE GREAT TOWER OF BABEL IN BABYLON, IRAQ. The Earth was almost empty after the great Flood, where all the remaining hybrids (hominids) were killed, since they didn’t enter the ark of Noah.

THERE WERE ALREADY GREAT SHIPS (ark of Noah) and there was a division of the earth. People arrive very quickly to America, China, India, Europe… I think they knew already the Geography of the planet, such knowledge coming possibly from the antediluvian period. HISTORY CONFIRMS it: the GREAT CIVILIZATIONS BEGAN VERY QUICKLY SOME YEARS AFTER THE FLOOD: China, India, Middle East, Africa, Europe, even the native peoples of America…

A DEMOGRAPHIC CROSS CHECK IN (ANTI) CHRONOLOGICAL order SHOWS ALSO that the WORLD POPULATION IS REGULARLY INCREASING AT VARIABLE RYTHM IN LAST 4.000 YEARS.

It is NOT ALWAYS HUNGER FAMINE AND PEST even with less scientific knowledge + medicines.

IN SWEDEN, GOTLAND island, some 1900 years ago, THERE WERE SO MANY PEOPLE, THAT THEY HAD TO DEPART… THE GOTHS DEPARTED FROM SWEDEN AND REIGNED FOR A WHILE IN SPAIN AND ITALY…

Back to top

But : GOOD PROTECTIONS FROM GOD + RESISTANCE TO SUPPORT ADVERSITY RECOMMENDED IF YOU WANT TO DEFEND TRUTH, because evil wants to confuse the masses and takes ruse revenge against those who try to oppose… this web site www.christianideas.eu tries to help

JESUS SPEAKS ABOUT SCIENCE e. g. in old web site www.apparitionsmariales.org dinosaurs included… afterwords, it’s only a question to cross check the data…

Watch out: most of scientific official knowledge is true. Only non proofed theories from origins, contradicting the good translations of book of Genesis one must watch out. And truths and hard to proof lies may be mixed... some discernment thus required...

NO, MAN SHALL NOT EVOLVE TO SUPERMAN AND FLY ONLY PER THEORY OF EVOLUTION, EVEN IF YOU WAIT MILLIONS OF YEARS. MUTATIONS INDEED EXIST, but it doesn't work in this way! You may remain watching for the hasar to act accordingly... keep then waiting...

NO, IF WE GENERALIZE THE MODEL OF THE BUS RUNNING AT 100 km/h during 3 hours to 200 DAYS, NO, THAT BUS COME NOT FROM THE MOON, EVEN IF THEORETICALLY IT COULD BE POSSIBLE... SUCH THEORETICAL MATHEMATICAL SPEED MODELS OVER DISPLACEMENT OF CONTINENTS OR GALAXIES RISK TO INTRODUCE THIS KIND OF ERRORS! HOWEVER SUCH MODELS SEEM TO BE TRUE FOR THE LAST 6100 years... some discernment required... wonders and sudden changes do exist and may radical change these theoretical models which normally work in the recent past...

Do not be afraid to believe the 6 days recite: we can proof the evolutionism theory is full of imprecisions/errors... further details or argumentation in other sections over Bible and scientific chapters, namely Darwinism and Big Bang theories. Some reorganization of ideas / contents eventually needed... in the future, if God helps...

"Elastic" Days?

Back to top

Please note that the book of Genesis states clearly that the earth and the heavens, empty of stars, existed before the first day, thus, before 6.000 years ago...

There's the possibility that the term 'day' refers to a (long) period of time, and not '24 literal hours', which that means that we could consider a "day" as the period of time that the Earth takes to rotate over herself, and that eventually this period could be significantly different from the 'present 24 hours' in the past.

This possibility is however to discard, because Adam was created by God about 6.100 years ago, said Jesus, and the book of Genesis says it was during the sixth day...

This possibility of days elastic which try to make compatible Creation dates with Scientific Dates collides with the fact that, after the day of creation of Adam/Eve, God still rests one day, the 7th day of the Creation. I think this makes impossible to make the first 6 days as periods of time of "million or thousands of years", because, if God created Adam during the 6th day, about 6100 years ago, then the 7th day must correspond only to a period of time of 24 hours. The 6 days should then be days of 24 hours, like now. And the period of time of a day should be considered as a constant: 24 hours.

Note: it could eventually be possible that the time the Earth rotate towards herself change. That could create days with duration different from 24 hours. But days strongly different from 24 hours doesn't really fit in the logic of the 6th day and 7th day of Creation, which should be considered as days of 24 hours. That's why I believe that the other 5 days should also last the same as the 6th and the 7th. Why should God make the first 5 days lasting millions or thousands of years and the 6th and 7th day of 24 hours? To confuse people? I don't think so, because the recite of Creation is clear, although hard to believe...

Three Parallel Theories for the Origin of the Universe. Only One is True.

Back to top

There presently (at least) three parallel theories, to try to explain the same phenomena: the origins of the Universe. Because in some points, they're significantly different, only one may be true: not the three.

Two of those theories are scientific: the theory of the Big Bang and the theory of the Big_Bounce. Of course, remains always the theory I believe, that of the Creation of the Universe by God in 6 days, as stated in the Bible, but I recognize it is hard to believe, specially to people which only believe in things they see everyday and not in supernatural phenomena.

The Theory of the Big Bang makes believe that the Universe was created about 13.8 billions of years ago from a "Single Point" and a "Great Explosion".

The theory of the Big Bounce, states instead that the Universe follows periods of expansion and contraction. Thus, before the present period of Expansion of the Universe, (which means that galaxies are moving away from each other), there was a preceding period of "contraction of the Universe". Thus, initially the Universe contracted, up to a moment when there was a "bounce", and since then, the Universe keeps expanding up to the present day.

Watch out: Scientifics are trying to make "Big Bounce" and "Big Bang" "Compatible"

Back to top

Please watch out, because scientists are trying to make compatible 'Big Bang' and 'Big Bounce', but the 2 theories in reality are incompatible. Big Bounce collides with Big Bang, because the theory of the Big Bang states that the Universe started from a huge explosion from a "Single Point". The Theory of the Big Bounce states instead that the Universe contracted up to a certain "volume", but not up to a Single Point.

It was precisely because that story of "a Single Point of Infinite Mass or Energy" was quite "bizarre" that the Theory of the Big Bounce was created: a group of scientists came thus with an alternative theory.

Now, some will make believe that the "Big Bang" was only a step inside a generic theory of successive contractions and expansions of the Universe. In such "tale", the Universe contracts up to a Single Point of "Infinite energy" and, afterwards, a "Big Bang" explosion occurs, which could explain why the Universe is currently expanding.

Back to top

The defenders of the Theory of the Big Bounce, contracting up to a certain "volume", but not up to a Single Point, argue that those "gravitational forces" are stopped at atomic level, because, at that level, the Quantum Mechanic forces are stronger than the gravitational forces (otherwise the atomic structure would be destroyed).

The adepts of compatibility between these 2 theories, would argue instead that, at the Single Point, it would exist 50% of matter and 50% of antimatter, thus, Energy (with, thus, the possible destruction of the preceding matter).

We know that there are 2 formulas for conversion of Energy into matter, one "stable", but " very dynamic" and with no antimatter, where Energy equals Matter in rapid movement:

E = matter m1 x (light speed)²,

and another one, more "static" but less "stable", because it makes use of antimatter:

Energy = (50%) matter m₂ + (50%) antimatter m_2- .

The problem with the attempts to try to include the "Big Bang theory" in the succession of "Big Bounces (expansion/contractions)" is that this succession of expansions/contractions implies continuous movement, in large scale, of the Universe mass: per definition, if there's an expansion/contraction of the Universe Mass, there's a movement of the galaxies... Thus, the conversion formula shall be the one which doesn't use antimatter...

Thus, if the Universe is in "rapid" movement, then there should be no place for huge quantities of antimatter: the existing Energy is used to give "movement" to the existing Universe Mass and, it is, thus, not converted into Antimatter (behalf in very small quantities, please refer to the topic "matter/antimatter", further below).

Back to top

Thus, if the Universe is cyclically contracting up to a "Single Point", because the Universe Mass is permanently moving, then it is not probable that all the Mass concentrates in a Single Point, "stops moving", for a given period of Time (which could be then "everlasting", not necessarily "instantaneous"), in order to convert, using the static conversion formula, the preceding Mass/Energy into 50% matter (m2) + 50% antimatter (m2-), and afterwards, begins moving from "nothing", without a trigger. It should stop (at planetary level). Point.

But no: the adepts of Big Bang defend the "new Universe" should then start from the "enormous explosion" trigger... where does it come from?

It is required then that (almost) all preceding antimatter disappears then, in order to get the Energy which supports the movement of the "new" Universe mass, in continuous expansion...

It likes to me another scientific modern "tale"... another logical science fiction tale to confuse/elude modern university people...

Thus, the "Single Point" aspect of the "Big Bang Theory" contradicts the original purposes of the "Theory of Big Bounce". Don't believe thus in serious 100% compatibility. This "100% compatibility" is conceived again to elude people.

If we take into account the limits set by Quantum Mechanics to keep the atomic structure and if we want to make the "Big Bang" and "Big Bounce" theories compatible, the "Single Point" consideration of the "Big Bang theory" should disappear.

Of course, I prefer rather the "hard to believe" 6 day theory of the Bible, but, because of lack of proofs, the reader has the choice...

Please note that normally the "gravitational forces" are under control of the universe laws, because the universe is currently expanding, i. e. galaxies are moving away from each other, despite the existence of attractive gravitational forces, and they're moving with a increasing speeds, the farthest ones with speeds even greater than the speed of the light (very quickly!).

Why should they revert their movement in order to make the universe contract again??? There's so much resistance to this movement??? No, because space is infinite and has no borders, like a three-dimensional xyz cartesian mathematical axis...

P.S. The Quantum Mechanics theory defend that at atomic level the atomic particle forces are stronger than the gravitational ones.

Because of this, a contraction of the Universe shall not go up to a "Single Point" of infinite mass/energy... at a certain point, when the Universe Mass should be enough near from each other, the bounce should thus begin...

This means, that, while at macroscopic level a thing (star/planet?) is attracted by another one, through gravitational attraction, when the two bodies are very close from each other, when it risks to destroy the atomic structure, what happens is the opposite:

Inside the atom structure, for instance, the protons ('+' particles) expel each other; they're kept together under the atomic core "membrane".

If these membranes are destroyed, than the protons are liberated, and these forces are repulsive ('+' expels '+' and '-' expels '-'...).

We have proofs that, in normal situations, collision of things don't destroy the atomic structure in that way: a car accident, a snooker ball collision... doesn't create 50% matter and 50% antimatter... it remains at matter level...

what happens normally is, thus, a crash or a bounce...

that means, to keep the Universe mass concentrated in that "Single Point", it should be necessary an enormous pressure and to close the Universe Mass temporarily "hermetically", in order to avoid it to escape...

otherwise it escapes, because of the repulsive atomic forces and collisions style "snooker ball"...

The Only Evidence: Universe is Expanding. The Rest is Speculation.

Back to top

The only Evidence, thus, the only proof related to the origin of the Universe theories, is that the Universe is in Expansion. All the rest is non proofed, thus, pure theory, even fiction, because the 2 scientific theories contradict each other in some "topics".

The theory of the Creation of the Universe by God in 6 days may be 100% compatible with the evidences (galaxies are presently running away from each other in a expansive universe). That information was simply not mentioned, which means that, immediately after the Creation of the Universe by God, about 6100 years ago, the galaxies should be immediately moving away from each other, according to the recently created laws of the nature which concern them.

Conclusion: We have 3 (or more) Parallel Theories for the Creation of the Universe which respects the Evidences (Universe presently in Expansion). Each theory contradicts the other at one or another point, simply because they're different alternatives. Only One is Completely True. You may choose the one you prefer, because all (three+) theories contain non proofed elements.

However, The Lord says always the truth. And His language is generally very clear and explicit (exceptions: prophecies and parabolas). The Creation event is no parabola, neither prophecy, thus it should be taken as it is mentioned, literally, even if it is hard to believe.

Continents Separated "Millions of Years" ago?

Back to top

Please consider the theory of displacement of the continents of Geology. We can see in a world map, that the continents may derive from one continent mass in the beginning. This is logical and doesn't necessarily contradict the Bible, which says God separated the waters from the dry land during the 6 days of the creation. I think that God did the separation of the continents during the 3rd day, according to the Bible, and afterwards, they still move, but very slowly since then, according to the laws of the nature (recently created, at least those which relates to this domain).

Please consider Brazil and the coast of the Gulf of Guinea (West Africa). We see clearly that they seem to be splitted from each other in the past. Please assume a distance of ~7.000 Km between Brazil and the related African coast. We know that presently South American plate/Brazil moves to West about 1.5 up to 10 cm every year.

Back to top

Just to see how scientific dating can be wrong, I'm going to compare two possible dating/calculus methods related to the displacement of continents. The first takes into account Divine intervention during the 3rd day of Creation of Genesis. The second does not. Please consider that Science, takes into account only logical procedures and present reality and facts.

Per definition, Science ignores divine intervention and wonders. If they existed, Science can only say that they can not explain it according to the laws of the nature, (e. g. the incorruptible bodies of the Catholic Anti-modernist Saints can not be explained in a scientific way...), and, referring to the past, Science simply ignore any divine miraculous intervention that may could exist, preferring to find a rational credible explanation, even if it doesn't reflect what in reality really happened.

Back to top

First dating calculus taking into account Divine Intervention

We assume as true the Genesis recite and thus, that God separated Brazil from West Africa about 6100 years ago. Since then we estimate that South America/Brazil moves West from Africa with a theoretical speed about 10 cm + 3.5 cm = 13.5 cm per year (assuming this speed unchanged with time, since the creation period). This means that Brazil moved West since the 3rd day of creation about:

~6100 years x ~0.135 m/year= ~823.5 meters.

This means: since God's intervention, Brazil moved West only about 825 m! Or a distance near from some (hundreds of) meters, with more accurate data for the speed of relative displacement of Brazil from Africa and for a more accurate chronology of the Creation (we could take the genealogies from the Bible for more accurate numbers)!!!.

Scientific Explanation without Divine Intervention

Back to top

Assuming a distance of ~7.000 km (between the coast of Brazil and the coast of West Africa) and a relative displacement of America to West (relative to West Africa) of about ~13.5 cm, per year. Assuming God didn't intervene, and as once Brazil and West Africa were together and America keeps moving to West, there's a logical probability this separation occurred at:

time = displacement / speed = ~7.000 km / ~0.135 m per year= ~7.000.000 m/~0.135 m per year= ~ 51.851.852 = ~50 millions of years ago!!!

Alternatively, assuming other possible data also available in the internet for the relative speed of displacement of S. America from Africa, e. g., 4 cm/ year, with similar calculus as those above, we could estimate that South America moves away from Africa, since 175.000.000 years ago, a value more coherent with those provided by Scientific professionals.

Do you see now where Science gets these enormous datings considering the "far past"??? Because Science simply doesn't take into account supernatural Divine intervention!!!

For the creation of the universe/galaxies the idea behind the false enormous scientific datings is precisely the same, because the universe is also presently in movement, according to the laws of the physics...

Astrophysics and Dating: Stars Dating 13.4 Billions of Years?

Back to top

The distance of the farthest galaxies is a non proofed subject, like the "million of years" time. In the same way that we can not go back in time 1 million of years to see what happened at that moment, the same goes for the far distances: even if the calculus are quite logical, scientific and rigorous, we can still not measure those distances with a metric tape, which is the only way to measure the related coherence with reality, indispensable to proof the truthfulness of a fact...

According to the book of Genesis, the universe was created only at the fourth day, but the earth and the skies existed already before the first day... Science says the limits of the visible universe are currently ~13.4 billion years light far, and that the Big Bang should be created ~14 billion years ago... the real distance is non proofed, but we're going to consider the 13.4 billion years light as true... Science (some theories, at least) still considers that the Universe expands much further than the Visible Universe, up to ~ 3 times the Visible Universe, the farthest galaxies moving away (~3 times the speed of the light) from the Earth, in every direction... Every consideration outside the Visible Universe is non proofed, but we may assume it's ~true...

The truth is only one. And this means that the correct numbers must agree, if we take a non biblical scientific or a biblical/scientific approach. I may assume the distance of the farthest galaxy as true, thus as a ray of ~ 13.4 billions of years light for Visible Universe or a ray of ~42 billions of years light for the whole Universe (including the invisible farthest parts).

Where should de be then the problem to calculate dates using Big Bang and 6 day Creation approaches?

I think, the huge problem is that the speeds, don't match in the 6 day Creation theory and in the Big Bang & other Scientific theories. Considering the present model for the Universe as valid, the one of a "baking growing bread with raisins", the speeds don't need to follow always that model (like for the displacement of continents): in the same way as the car goes slower inside a city, but a lot quicker in the highway... sometimes, speeds... change... Only that!

And now we recognize that galaxies can move a lot quicker than light speed... don't put limits to speed if they don't exist... even with Universe with a theoretical ray 3 times bigger than visible Universe or not, that doesn't change anything... you only have to take into account the displacements started about ~6100 years ago and not some billions of years ago... Mainly the Scientific theories use Mathematical models, normally correct for the present times, but which may not reflect reality from the far past (more than 6000 years). There's no way to proof it...

But now, and since the 6th day, probably the Laws of the Nature set by God are normally respected. It was in principle during the 4th day that the big displacements/changes took place: there's even teleportation! Very high speeds or teleportation or something else of the style ("automatic" convertion of energy into mass; a wonder etc.), and it happened!

Possible Scenario considering the farthest visible galaxies displacement in the last 14 billion years/ 6100years. In the 6-day scenario, they could be set immediately (or at very high speeds), at the yellow line, and the same "small" displacement would occur since then in both models, respecting the laws of the nature/astrophysics...

Possible Speed Incoherences since the Great Explosion (Big Bang)

Back to top

In the present speeds model for galaxies, in the ray of ~14 billion of years light (limits of visible Universe), galaxies/stars can move away from the Earth, even with speeds (a "little" bit) higher than "c", the speed of the light, galaxies moving away from earth with increasing speeds, when distance increases... At a scale of the Universe as a whole, at the limits of the Universe, with a "theoretical ray ~3 times bigger than that of the visible Universe", galaxies move away in every direction with a speed ~3 times the speed of the light...

This implies different speed and acceleration rhythms for the Big Bang Model of Dates... Why?

If we consider only the Visible Universe and the (increasing) displacement speeds for galaxies, according to the Hubble's Law and, considering the Hubble constant H0 as ~72 km/(s*Mpc), we could estimate the speed of the possible galaxies at the edge of the visible Universe, moving away from earth at a speed ~310.000 km/s, slightly above that of c, the speed of the light.

Back to top

Calculus: considering a distance d of 14 billions of years light and the conversion constant k of ~3.260.000 years light/ Mpc we could estimate the speed v of the galaxies at the borders of visible universe, using Hubble's law:

v = H0 * d /k = ~310.000 km/s

...in the same way at a distance d/2 from earth galaxies should move with a speed of v2= ~v/2 = ~155.000km/s...

and, at a distance 3 times bigger than the visible universe, we should expect (in theory!) then...

v3= H0* 3d /k = 3*v, thus, speeds close to 3 times the speed of the light at the theoretical borders of the Universe (as a whole)...

In order to have that Big Bang date of ~14 billion of years time for the Big Explosion, then those galaxies (in the visible border of the Universe) would be traveling from the Single Point with an average speed (or, alternatively a constant speed) similar of that of c, the speed of the light... but speeds are increasing... when galaxies move away from earth (a theoretically "Single Point" for the Big Explosion, because the earth is the center of observations)...

Back to top

Because of that, accelerations/speeds/mathematical models must necessarily change... thus, in the past, those galaxies were closer to the earth and thus moving away with smaller speeds (please refer to calculus above to have a better idea...); that means that those galaxies could not even reach the Single Point, if we go in inverse chronological order, because their speeds in the past would than be (a lot) smaller than c, the speed of the light: at half of the distance, they move (away) with half of the speed!

However, mathematically it's always possible to make a model of speeds/dates coherent with the dates of Big Bang...science seems already to consider different speeds/accelerations models for different periods of time... (it seems that in the begin, because of gravity forces, the speeds were even slower...)... anyhow, even if the mathematical model becomes coherent with distances, speeds, accelerations and dates, it doesn't necessarily match reality for the far past... it remains theoretical... non proofed for the far past...

... this possible incoherence is only an example... in practice, all these theories from the beginning of the Universe, scientific (or Biblical) are non proofed... we don't have all the elements... there's no way to proof dates from the far past and mathematical models are not enough as proofs...

A Global Vision of Universe, containing the Earth, Paradise, Hell...

Back to top

It follows first some comments over the possibility of setting the earth as center of Mass of Universe. Although logical hypothesis, according to the book Genesis, in practice it's non proofed and other possibilities, more complicated are also possible: speculation, thus...

Science says that, in the Visible Universe "window" , the farthest galaxies dist ~13.4 billions of years light from the ***Earth***, moving away from each other, in any direction.

The Earth could match, thus, the "Single Point" of the Big Bang theory and be the center of the universe, because, stars and galaxies are moving away from the earth in every direction, but with increasing speeds, according to the "sphere model/Raisin baking Bread" mentioned above. However, this only the visible part of the Universe. Science estimates that the whole Universe Mass has a "ray" ~3 times bigger (it doesn't have to be a big sphere, but something of the style, such as a "big baking expanding Raisin bread"...

But, according to the scientific theories, following this model of galaxies moving away from the Earth/Solar System with increasing speeds, is NOT enough to establish our galaxy/Solar system/Earth as center of the Universe Mass/"Sphere"/"Raisin Growing Baking Bread".

They estimate that it happens with the Earth, but it could also happen from another point inside the Universe mass, because the relative speeds respect the same rules. OK, it may be, BUT THE EARTH/SOLAR SYSTEMS ARE IN ANY CASE (good?) CANDIDATES. BUT NOT THE ONLY ONES.

Back to top

If the Earth is/would be the Center of the Universe, the fact that Earth remains in the Solar System, it moves, should not have consequences with the possibility of keeping being the center of Mass of the Universe.

It is almost natural that the Earth be the Center of the Universe in Creationism. Why? Simply because, before the first day of the Creation of the Universe, the only "thing" which existed in the Whole Universe was the Earth. It is quite normal that God then creates the solar system, and afterwards, galaxy after galaxy around the Earth (and its Solar System).

The limit should then be the latest galaxies (thus, the surface of the Universe Mass "sphere"/ "Raisins growing baking bread"). However other more complicated possibilities could also be possible... but why to make it complicated? Hell maybe the precise center, in the center of the earth, always direction "down", afterwards, the Earth Surface (+ Jerusalem) as the "center of attentions" and heaven after the farthest galaxy/star, outside the Universe Mass "sphere", always direction "up", even in Australia (fantastic!). But even if the Earth is not the center of mass of the Universe, the declarations of heaven towards relative position of Hell and Paradise may remain valid.

Back to top

But, OK, there's lack of scientific proofs over the subject. Please note that the relative position of Hell and present Paradise is 100 % literally true faith Catholic Credo compatible. First 2 images below, left and right, try to show what happened to galaxies near the Earth in the last 6.100 years (after the 6 days of creation), visible Universe sphere only. Please note that the Earth is the center of this Sphere (Visible Universe), but not necessary of the whole Universe mass. The following 2 images below tries to give a simple Global Vision of the Universe, containing also the Earth, Hell and Paradise, full Cath Credo True Faith compatible (literally). Sources: +- serious messages from heaven from www.apparitionsmariales.org + www.tldm.org.

Teleportation Exists. Consequences.

Back to top

According to the declarations of Our Lady and Jesus in New York, they live in Paradise, which is located just at a short distance from the farthest star of the Universe (thus outside the "spheres" of the Universe Mass, represented in previous scheme's). Please refer to: www.tldm.org: locating Heaven in the Universe . These declarations have several strong consequences in the astrophysics domain:

• the volume or 3D Space of the universe seems to be infinite, even if the universe is expanding
• the (mass of the) universe is finite, even if the universe is expanding
• teleportation exists, because Jesus and Our Lady travel from the borders of the universe to the earth instantaneously. That means that it is possible to travel enormously quicker than the speed of the light, theoretically constant near the earth at 300.000 km/s. Mary simply doesn't take 14/42 billions of years, traveling at the speed of the light to come to Lourdes or Medjugorje. It goes a lot faster.

I don't really know the formula God used to create the Universe. Don't forget that Science of God is a lot superior to that of man. The Science of God goes above the laws of the physics, and may use what we currently call "miracles".

Even don't using supernatural "superpowers", God could create the Universe departing from some formulas of conversion from Energy into matter, or matter into matter (and reciprocally). There are several procedures of this style, although remains quite difficult to man to control them good at different levels. Examples:

• Energy= mass * (speed of light)* (speed of light), generally known as E=mc². This formula (Einstein) states that Energy can be converted into mass in movement (or reciprocally). Maybe it is used to give stability to our Universe, because "stars are constantly traveling"...
• Energy = matter + antimatter, no need of (such) speeds, but quite unstable (?)
• nuclear procedures
• chemical reactions
• ...

Back to top

The volume of the Universe seems to be infinite, in order to contain the permanently always growing mass of a finite Universe... the Universe (mass) has to be finite, because Heaven exists after the physical limits of the Universe, in the (theoretical) infinite Space/Volume...

Because Our Lady and Jesus don't lie, teleportation exists: it is possible to travel enormous distances instantaneously: there's thus no speed limit in the universe... or there are a kind of High speed tunnels/teleportation... if Our Lady can travel at a theoretical infinite speed, it should also be possible for the Universe to expand quicker than the theoretical constant speed of light. This have as consequences that the distance of ~14/~42 billions years light of the farthest visible star doesn't imply necessarily the creation of the universe ~14 billions years ago, but could be created long time later, e. g., ~6100 years ago, behalf the earth, which already existed before...

Some Comparisons between Big Bang and the Biblical Creation Theory

Back to top

Some parts of the theory of Big Bang and the theory of the 6 days maybe be compatible. Indeed, the chronological sequence mentioned in both theories is almost the same.

The first day, God created the light (the sky and the Earth were already created...). The second day, God created the atmosphere. The third day, God separated the dry land from the seas, and created the plants.

Concerning the fourth day:

Gen 1,14-19:

"14 Then God said: "Let there be lights in the dome of the sky, to separate day from night. Let them mark the fixed times, the days and the years,
15 and serve as luminaries in the dome of the sky, to shed light upon the earth." And so it happened:
16 God made the two great lights, the greater one to govern the day, and the lesser one to govern the night; and he made the stars.
17 God set them in the dome of the sky, to shed light upon the earth,
18 to govern the day and the night, and to separate the light from the darkness. God saw how good it was.
19 Evening came, and morning followed - the fourth day"

Back to top

Reading this text, we may conclude that God created the sun, the moon and the stars during the 4 day, which contradicts the Theory of the Big Bang, which says the stars were created before the plants and even the earth. What has happened then? Simply remember that scientific dating, Carbon 14 and others, is fallacious and not accurate, in what concerns the far past... if God decided to create the stars and the moon, after the earth and even after the plants, what is the problem? A mistake in the scientific dating accuracy? Scientific dating is not accurate and the science should not impose theories/datings which they cannot proof as truths or dogmas. They're not truths... they're hypothesis, that's something else...

Please take into account the following topics: matter can travel at speeds largely higher than the speed of the light... teleportation and wonders seem to exist, and that implies that God could have everything created in the fourth day as stated in the Bible, and set the stars "instantaneously" in the right place through wonders or any other "sophisticated" method, letting afterwards the stars be ruled by the laws of the astrophysics... the exceptional events in the fourth day can disturb enormously the scientific methods of dating, which means that they should not take as continuous and constant something which is probably the composition of two completely different phenomena: the creation procedure in the fourth day and the normal evolution of the Universe afterwards...

The sequence of the remaining days offers no difficulties. God created all kind the animals, and finally God created the man, but this time through a wonder-like procedure from the clay of the ground...

For all other details concerning datings, arguments against (and some truths of) the evolutionism, origin of races, Adam, the hominids, please refer to the link Arguments Against Evolutionism

Fake Long Dates: Conclusion

Back to top

Concerning Fake Long Scientific Dates, thus dates referring to before 4.000 BC:

• Historical Maps from ~2000 BC confirm rather the book of Genesis, because the Ark was left in Turkey, near Armenia, and civilization began in Middle East, e.g., the Babel (Babylon) tower biblical episode (please cross the book of Genesis with Ancient History: Mesopotamian empire of Akkad)... some date faults already possible! Please refer to chapters 'Ark of Noah' and 'Darwinism unmasked'
• Appearance of Modern man: genetics contradict fossils concerning dates (watch out: evil forces may "educate" genetics), but the historical maps are difficult "to correct" by evil forces... watch out: errors of ~1000 years already possible referring to the period near the great Flood, to confuse! Please refer to chapter 'Darwinism unmasked'
• dates based on displacement of continents or displacement of galaxies: they're speed mathematical theorical models; it's like to compute time from departure of a car moving in the highway... Normally these models are correct for the last ~6000 years... but before that period, normally they're wrong, like the car it is not always moving in the Highway... it's pure theoretical non proofed...
• ...

Curiosity: Why there's only small Quantities of Antimatter in the Universe?

Back to top

Concerning the small quantities of antimatter found in the universe, I think they could maybe be the rests of the nuclear activity God may have used to transform the radioactive elements into other more stable elements (e.g., rests from decomposition of neutrons, and activities of the style...). So, no antimatter hidden universe to be expected...

please note that matter to become stable, according to the science, shall be in constant movement…

seeming that E = mc²...

implying thus the universe in constant expansion(movement)…

the static matter/antimatter method,

E = matter + antimatter,

doesn’t give stability and may even be dangerous: permanent risk of collision of matter with the corresponding antimatter, disintegrating back into energy...

Comparing the 2 equations of transformation of Energy into matter, we have thus:

matter x (light speed)² = matter + antimatter,

seemingt thus, that, when matter is in movement, some of the energy (which should implied in the creation of antimatter is rather) used to move the Universe mass, the "positive" matter... only the static rests of antimatter should remain then...

Back to top

I try to pray for protection to all pro God of planet until 00:00h, to try to disinfest, but it's better to complement it with 24h protective prayer, e.g. attentive rosary or (easier/shorter) 7 sorrows (here further below).

http://www.christianideas.eu/#about tries to help...

Over Web site of Ideas from Catholic Russia Converted,

www.christianideas.eu:

• DISCERNMENT Criteria, e.g. true faith catho conservative non naive: risk of sect new age in Rome=> the Apocalypse... => better to be in state of grace go to confession to catholic priest asap, after Benedict XVI
  
  
• Risk of Great Famine => news from heaven +- serious to e.g. Enoch, G Lomax, L de Maria, J Leary...
  
  Ideas (pro God) to (try) to resist Great Famine:
  - St Onofre with a Crumb of Bread,
  - Blessed grapes L Maria + S Damiano...
  
  
• MODERN LIES unmasked
  (Lies of Darwinism, Fake Dates...)
  
  History + demographics since 2000BC unmask fake dates. Hominids were hybrids which existed before great Flood, confirms Jesus at from old web site from V De Tarlé apparitionsmariales.org …
  
  Proactive Darwinism: ~mouse evolves=> bat => vampire, thus ancestor man/whale etc goes to=> Batman => Dracula... within same ~million years…
  
  
  
• Y haplogroups DNA migrations tend to proof Atlantis sank => Ice ages before Moses crossed the Red Sea? Science & Bible theory
  
  
• DANGER OF APOC after Benedict XVI => St Malachy prophecy:
  
  CHIP 666 IN BODY, WW3, risk vaccines Pest Grippe with 666 smart particles /changing DNA RNA , throw virus (by plane) to kill vaccinated, “good” apocalyptic new age sect, THE GLOBAL EMPIRE SOCIALIST COMMUNIST OF ANTICHRIST... => lots of apocalyptic prophecy at www.tldm.org (for scenario Russia not converted)
  
  
• ICON OF AUTOMATIC Eternal SALVATION
  (also here above)
  

  THOSE WHO TRUST 100% IN JESUS through THIS PICTURE SHALL BE SAVED (a Jesus of St Faustina with rays blue red)
  
  

• PROTECTIONS against EVIL, but some suffering needed, sorry!
  (a summary a bit further below)
  
  
• IMMORTALITY SUGGESTION:
  

  TO PRAY GOD for ETERNAL SALVATION for THOSE WHO NEEED IT MOST, CALMS 'only' DANGERS for LIFE.
  (you have nothing to loose, if you feel dying, even if formula is limited …
  after: begin discreet fast + attentive daily prayer(as rosary) until it calms/improves => ~30 days for diabetes,
  ok not so easy, but it's better than cancer operations, (1-3 days should calm grippe…))
  
  

• GLBT + Modern Sex BEHAVIOURS: Unhealthy, even KILL...
  It attracts pests… Vaccine Papilloma protected only 70%...
  it’s possible to attack underconscious, e.g., via discrete sorcery… => Nero case study...
  
  
  
• ***2 BILLIONs+ MURDERS*** SINCE ~1960:
  the ABORTION horrors... It attracts pests…
  
  
  
• IDEAS AGAINST AGING & GRIPPE/PEST /Evil
  
  Dangers of Vaccins: e.g. 666 etc.
  BETTER ALTERNATIVES + Pro God: Fast & prayer (good against evil => Medjugorje) until it calms... (discreet fast & prayer or in solidarity group, prayer style (attentive daily) rosary or 7 sorrows... some food may help: avoid white sugars (fruits honey better if sweet food needed), but 1/8 glass whiskey or vodka (=> let it disinfect (few minutes) at the throat…), 1/6 glass vinegar, 2 cloves raw good garlic mixed e.g. in salad to help counter pest... + immortality suggestion in dramatic cases to calm a bit and in place of dying win forces to pray a rosary /7sorrows... + details links above below
  
  VACCINATED RISK TO DIE WITHIN ~7 YEARS WITHOUT FORMULAS PRO GOD (see above; formulas from news from heaven maybe work against vaccines… Exorcism water? miraculous medal, faithful see light cross in sky after great warning, Oils?... ?? )
  
  
  
• IDEAS FOR A BETTER LOOK (Ladies & Veil)
  
  How FAKE PUBS BRUNETTE & Erotica ARE KILLING CATHOLIC MARRIAGE FOR LIFE: Sarah x Agar…
  
  (because of unhappy husband: too few beautiful ladies to choose… SOS Aesthetics...
  
  correlations 30 years to detect trends:
  
  ... lady educating children in micro appart feels so happy as Husband with lady with not cared aesthetics... eats white sugared stuff=> brunette Scheherazade look puts husbands away...) Aesthethic care is to have heart for husband. Comparative Tables at section 'Our Lady of Fatima deserves better look'
  
  
  
• MODERN WOMAN IDEOLOGY UNMASKED:
  Demographic fall in West (+ Russia)…
  stats (1950 or) 1970-2019: Germany x India…
  
  
• LINKS TO some HEAVEN NEWS
  
  
• Censured on Twitter: @_ChristianIdeas
  
  
• At https://www.facebook.com/christian.ideas some images
  
  
• Possible:
  T shirts Posters “Songs” Christian Ideas and/or Russia Converted Catholic (‘made in Belgium’)...
  
  
• School
  (e.g. Maths, Computer Science: exercises, complements to Wikipedia…)
  
  
• Christian Ideas at Linkedin
  (https://be.linkedin.com/in/christian-ideas-104ba893)
  
  

Back to top

If You Want to Defend Good,

PROTECTIONS against EVIL + Take Cross Recommended

(IMMORTALITY SUGGESTION at 1st Sign of Danger,

CONTRACT WITH GOD (ICON AUTOMATIC SALVATION THROUGH DIVINE MERCY), (home page or below), + Daily (better, Attentive):

Rosary, and / or

7 Sorrows, and / or

Crusade Prayer 33,

Crusade Prayer 140 (to speak without fears),

to be in state or go to confession catholic priest asap ...

+ details at christianideas.eu

I try to pray for protection all pro God of planet until 00:00h, to try to disinfest, but it's better to complement it, with 24h protective prayer, e.g., attentive rosary or (easier/shorter) 7 Sorrows prayer.

Satan demanded to God 75-100 years to destroy Vatican + money + power => www.tldm.org. Satan had that time, that money, that power. 150 years later, despite dangers + evil, Vatican still resists. Let us see evolution... ??? apocalyptic? reversal pro God (again)???

Back to top

Note: www.christianideas.eu began in ~2009 and keeps growing. IT REMAINS INCOMPLETE + NOT PERFECT.

Because IT IS NOT FINISHED, NO FINAL VERSION (.pdf) EXISTS. IT KEEPS GROWING/IMPROVING and there's still many changes to do (and few time, resources...). A complete review of the web site should be done, but it's already better than nothing...

If God helps, I'll try to improve and/or correct eventual detected errors, contents + design, little by little. A backup .zip exists (link colomn above). It contains most of the site, behalf the heavy assets.

Please feel free to print it, copy it, behalf, eventually, songs ... (contents license above left with some extra explanations, but the general goal is absolute freedom for use of text + images, in a good intentioned True Faith pro God use...)

Good intentioned Pub pro God True Faith welcome!!!
(protections from God recommended then! Evil doesn't like it...)

Back to top

Below: Our Lady of the Roses Honored Exposed and Death doesn't Enter inside.
(source: Jesus at old web site apparitionsmariales )